Several definitions from a long-defunct other site
Unschooling is...
What NOT to do
Origin of the term
Unschooling is creating and maintaining an atmosphere in which natural learning can flourish.Joyce Fetteroll doesn't like "natural learning," so I don't think it will be her favorite. Other people have favorite aspects. It's worth reading a dozen or thirty of them, and trying them out yourself. The beginning of the one above came when I was speaking in Arizona, and it wasn't being recorded, but Roxana Sorooshian was taking notes. She came up later and showed me something I had said, unscripted, that turned out to be the clearest, simplest definition up to that time. I put it in The Big Book of Unschooling. It was:
Unschooling is arranging for natural learning to take place.But in the next few years, it was carried around, turned over, examined, tried out, and polished. I think "creating and maintaining an atmosphere in which natural learning can flourish" is good.
|
"School is to unschooling as foreign language class is to learning to talk. The first is orderly, thorough, hard and hardly works. The second is chaotic, random, effortless and works like a charm."
—Joyce Fetteroll
July 2018 |
The basis of unschooling comes from seeing learning as a substantial human drive and seeing that learning depends absolutely on the perceptions of the learner. The second part is what makes everything tricky - you can't control what someone else learns. At best you can work on seeing the world from another person's perspective and try to create an environment which helps that person learn.It can help a lot to think about how people learn via their hobbies. In a way, that's what real life unschooling looks like: people learning through hobbies. It usually involves a lot of playing around - and the playing around parts are just as important to learning as the parts where you need to go look something up, or network with another hobbyist, or take a class or workshop to improve a skill.
One of the common parenting/educational myths is that it's possible to imbue children with "good habits" by making them do certain things over and over. It Seems like it Should work... but when you look at adults there's no evidence it does. The results are pretty random. It's not a strategy that helps people learn about the world.
I’ve been writing about unschooling for 20 years and I still struggle to define what unschooling is for a more general audience. The definition I wrote on the Tumblr blog built on some wording that Sandra uses to describe unschooling.I added some quotation marks. This came from Ten Questions with Joyce Fetteroll, the transcript of the Exploring Unschooling Podcast #14, by Pam Laricchia.
Unschooling is creating a rich environment where natural learning flourishes. So, to break that down, creating means intentional and deliberately, actively. The environment doesn’t just happen. Parents don’t sit back and let kids learn. The environment needs to be consciously created.
And "a rich environment" is everything, not just what’s in the house, but the stuff that families do outside the house, the opportunities available, and the parents’ own attitude. It’s the parents’ attitude that creates the atmosphere, the attitude toward curiosity, play, and towards the kids. A rich environment lets kids explore their interests while also swirling opportunities through their lives to discover new interests.
Then "natural learning" is how kids learn to talk and walk. It’s the learning that naturally grows in a rich, nurturing, supportive home life.
"Flourishes" is not merely existing, but growing and thriving. If the kids are ignored, they’ll learn. If the kids are given loving support and a rich stimulating environment, they will learn. But the two learns are universes apart. Unschooling focuses on learning that flourishes.